Question About Law????????

Either way you look at it, it was not a tort of negligence. Even if she struck back as a result of being hit, it was still entirely intentional. Here is a law article that explains intentional torts: a href="http://www.hullandzimmerman.com/articles/intentional-torts/" rel="nofollow"http://www.hullandzimmerman.com/articles…/a Basically, the thought is that-even if she was hit first-she should have gotten help instead of INTENTIONALLY striking back.